archive.today and archive.ph (also .is, .md, .fo, .li, .vn) are DDOSing a blogger who investigated them. They could also be Russian assets (js from mail[.]ru).

  • 2 Posts
  • 71 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 4th, 2026

help-circle







  • “Hey, we got this new invention that kinda works if you don’t stress it too much, so we don’t really know what to do with it, but it’s hype so we must include it somewhere prominently. Ideas?”

    Like reinventing the wheel, only it’s “intelligent” now.

    “But we already have headlines?”

    Of course that does not address the economical/political conspiracies involved here.

    AI is a scurge on humanity & our environment, and so is Google. Use other search engines.



  • From the article:

    According to the GEC’s published criteria, printer vendors have three compliance paths. They can avoid firmware changes that disable remanufactured cartridges, offer approved cartridge solutions that maintain device functionality, or make remanufactured options available for purchase through their own channels. Each route is meant to encourage a model in which printing components are reused rather than discarded.

    So far, more than 38,000 products remain listed under the older EPEAT 1.0 registry, while only 163 have transitioned to the new 2.0 standard – none of them printers.

    It’s not binding. Maybe articles like this one will shame hp into stopping that bs one day ☀️ (only joking)


  • I tried reading up on this whole thing, and my understanding is that Gyrovague, tired of archive.today bypassing paywalls, decided to dox who the owner of archive.today is.

    wdym “tired of”? Their original article from 2023 totally endorses archive.today, and there is no real doxxing happening there. According to the article linked in this post:

    The post mentions three names/aliases linked to the site, but all of them had been dug up by previous sleuths and the blog post also concludes that they are all most likely aliases, so as far as “doxxing” goes, this wasn’t terribly effective.

    And, having read that older article, I totally agree.

    Since many many people use this archive service every day, there’s also justified and legitimate public interest.

    I therefore also disagree with any attempt to portray this as some sort of tiff between netizens. No, gyrovague was very clearly attacked because whoever runs the archive got angry, scared, who knows.

    And right now, yeah, it’s tainted:

    And just like that, archive.today lost all of it’s legitimacy.