I doubt even the premise is true
deleted by creator
Same link you provided, scroll down a bit.
Male workforce: 26777
Female workforce: 13568
If you’d fleshed yhat out into an actual argument you’d likely have realized that you’ve no leg to stand on.
The only way that carries over for a conparison, regardless of your conclusion/evaluation is if the numerator (the total amount of income) is larger for men than it is for women such that the denominator (the number of people in the partition) cannot make up the difference. If you’ve got six pears and your parents have twelve, then you’re equal on pears. If you’ve 6 lemons and they’ve 20, they each have almost 2 lemons for every single one you have. Ratios are designed for meaningful relative comparisons given that the dimensions/units on both sides of the relation agree. Their rational components are not.
The premise was that there is a preference to hire women over men. The fact is that 66% of the workforce is male. Where is the preference?
We have no information about applicant ratios which would be helpful. So the conservative estimate is 50:50 until we know more. But in any case, the current data give us no indication for a preference for women that was claimed in this post.
Get some sleep!
deleted by creator
You’re implying here that the poor bosses have to hire men for some reason beyond their control, while they would really like to hire women instead.
The one data point that would support that it’s applicant ratios as I already mentioned. We don’t have that afaict.
Get some pizza
Because, they can shamelessly pay them less and get away with it?
No because men rape the dead bodies of women
That’s not the reason
How about a combination of both
I wouldn’t even consider to call them human, let alone “men”. Just talking animal.
Talking animal is what all humans are…
deleted by creator
Why would you consider that to be rape?
Why would any man consider that…
Ew.
As a man, some of my brethren are fucking gross and have no self control
Why wouldn’t you? There are very few instances in which one can assume they have consent over another person’s body.
Because rape is something that happens to a person, not an object. Are women raping their dildos?
Hey, what kinda person are you?
A rational one.
Putting aside the discussion about bodies and objects, the primary concern is consent - which also applies to objects anyway. Would you steal a dead person’s wallet “because they don’t need it anymore”?
Can you rape a wallet?
Dead people can’t consent
Neither can shoes.
Neither can couches.
A dead person isn’t equal to a shoe. As humans we show more respect to our dead than old shoes.
I’m sure dead people don’t mind.
They might not mind but their family members do
deleted by creator
Objects can’t consent at all and they never could, permission from an object to act on it sounds exactly like why the right think the left has gone crazy.
Biology, legality and philosophy all disagree with your assertion that a dead body is equivalent to random inanimate objects.
It’s human remains. A deceased individual. A corpse. You do not get to treat it on the same level as a shoe.
Biology and philosophy absolutely do not disagree. Some parts of philosophy, yes. Biologically they are a pile of complex organic matter that is unbinding.
And calling people objects is why the right is crazy.
If a person drowns and has no heartbeat, is it okay for you to have a quickie with them before the paramedics arrive to save him? Clinically they’re dead, so… by your logic, they’re an object, and never had the ability to consent in the first place, so quickly fucking them up the arse should be a-okay, right?
Or is there like a timer you have for when a person goes from a person to an object, which then retroactively never had personhood anyway? Is it just time, or is it temperature, or as soon as the smell sets in? Some people have been clinically dead for half an hour in cold water before being resuscitated, the cold helping protect from brain damage. And some people smell like dead bodies while alive.
I’m just curious as to your personal criteria.
The object never has agency. The person does. This edge case is a fine one, but only suggests that the person is dormant, not gone, and can be returned to life. If a body is in a morgue for a week, that ain’t going to be a possibility.
What do you mean never? When they were alive they could consent. Why does that change when they die? Just because someone is incapacitated through death, doesn’t give us the right to rape them. When consent is not given it is presumed you don’t have it.
When alive, the body was a person. They are not incapacitated through death, they dead. Gone. The person ceases to be and only the object and memories remain.
Bless my heart for thinking it was for corpse makeup…
I was thinking better expression of sympathy for the loved ones.
Can we get more than twelve pixels on this repost of a repost of a repost of a repost of a repost?
That person appears to have a face under their nose.
I’m guessing pixel blasted septum piercing
To pay them less? That’s so fucked up.
deleted by creator
Dudes just wanna crack open a cold one.
ಠ_ಠ
uncomfortable upvote
But Lemmy is blue for an upvote
Not in my front end
Must be on Voyager
Nah it’s boost
No, I mean on the Voyager app on iOS the upvote is blue.
Dudes just wanna snap into a slim jim
The fucking quality of your oneliners, a thing of beauty.
Ugh. Take my upvote.
Because the corpses don’t tell them how pretty they’d look if they smiled?
Haha heh ahhh lol
I scrolled through the whole comments section and not a single Sexy Losers reference? For shame.
That link is about as tame as the comic gets.
so i guess it was a massive red flag when i asked them how many cameras were in the room during my interview
No, but telling them about your Twitch channel was a bad idea.
“Yes sir, I do onlyfans as a side gig.”
damn i thought the title of the post was a slur and not did you know
Yes but…
Yes, but that’s temporary. They’ll get tender after a while 💖
I was more thinking they meant it’s something useful for women who’s into that stuff.
I didn’t think of the women! No wonder I’m single. At least until I’m dead and stiff 💖
A massive priapism!
There was some (mildly) famous case, I think a book was written about it, of a woman who was a necrophiliac and worked at a morgue. There was a big reddit thread about it years ago.
Also corpses turn rigid.
Just saying.
Bit chauvinistic to assume women can’t be necrophiles if they put their minds to it, innit?
Unlike the FBI I don’t make crass assumptions about my perverts.
