ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.eebanned_from_community_badge to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?message-squaremessage-square84linkfedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down16
arrow-up166arrow-down1message-squareWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.eebanned_from_community_badge to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square84linkfedilink
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down12·1 year agoNo, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·1 year agoThe definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoMmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down4·1 year agoit would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
No, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
The definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
Mmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)
it would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.