• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ehhhh no.

    I can get behind “ban spying on me.”

    I can even get behind “ban social media, especially the kind that makes you sell yourself, though pseudononymous link aggregators are less the issue.”

    But “no more torrenting at work, no more reading digitally while pooping, no more encrypted chats, now have to carry a book, a camera, an mp3 player, my GBC, and a dumb phone, just to make up for the phone?”

    No.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m just making commentary bud. Multiple times in the city I’ve seen people nearly get hit by busses because they cross the street nose deep in their phone without looking up. Some people can’t come unglued for 10 seconds to look both ways before crossing a busy roadway in a bus plaza, it’s kind of crazy!

  • ricdeh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is literally not a problem with smartphones, the problem is about the software you decide to run on it. A smartphone is simply a very powerful pocket computer.

    • Thinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I agree, except that we are legally not allowed to control the software on our phones in lots of cases. Notifications, ads, upgrades, etc. are all controlled by the manufacturer and it’s illegal to override their software on the device you own.

      Add to that that specific pieces of software are becoming increasingly necessary to function in society, and you start to see that it’s not really a matter of individual choice, anymore than people shopping at walmart can be blamed for buying processed, sugary foods when that’s 90% of what walmart stocks (And all they promote), and walmart is the only affordable option in their community.

      • 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Do it anyway. I use adb to modify my phone and make it suck less. I also look forward to the day (if it ever comes) where Linux phones are a viable replacement option.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’ve been able to turn off notifications for anything on my phone. Only the few apps I choose to allow still give me notifications.

        I am fortunate to have a job that does not require a cell phone, I can leave it behind for hours at a time without affecting my work. I know this is not the case for everyone, but it should be an option.

        At the very least, a phone required for work should have a separate phone number and email account, and should turn off automatically after the employee clocks out for the day. Some countries already have laws about this stuff, we should do that more.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    No. Smartphones convicted the murderer of George Floyd. Smartphones have shown to the world the police brutality that happens at peaceful protests. Technology isn’t inherently evil, it’s how its used.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Smart phones are just pocket computers. Up to you how their used, good evil neutral it’s all at ur fingertips.

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    How about no. I’ve been wanting a pocketable “do everything” device since I got a Tiger Electronics PokeDex as a kid. Don’t take this away from me.

    How about better regulations on the obscene amount of data collection going on behind our backs? I can’t count how many times I’ve come across even just websites that have a giant “accept all cookies” button, but in order to reject any, you have to dig through layers and layers of “settings”. The most I’ve seen was 80+. And that’s just websites.

    I’m about to wipe my phone and go all-in on Calyx OS.

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    smartphones are one of rhe hundreds o things that would probably be just fine and good if it weren’t for capitalism

  • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    The problem is with planned obsolescence and capitalist drive to always make more. The device itself is not inherently bad, it’s a glorified calculator.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Me who has a disability which prevents me from speaking and hearing people and renders me bedridden.

    “Okay, guess I’ll die then”

  • yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn’t at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

    Also, how do you disillusion the millions of people that use them religiously?

    I get the sentiment, but only a significant technologically literate society would really appreciate the need for greater control over their devices and actually possess the skills needed to modify and configure them.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Current smart phones will become e-waste either way. On that front, the benefit would be forcing all manufacturers to stop creating more e-waste for the future.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Author admits smartphones are ubiquitous, and doesn’t at all consider, in a hypothetical situation where everyone unanimously agreed to stop using them, where all this e-waste will go?

      Pretty much every single smartphone in use right now will be ewaste 20 years from now, and most of them will be within 10. So we have that disposal problem already regardless. Hypothetically, if everyone were to get rid of their phones, we’d at least stop creating even more future ewaste.

  • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hey David, can you guess how many people are reading your article from a smartphone? Convenient, isn’t it.

    Want to complain about smartphones? Write a book… or something that can be published on fucking paper.

      • TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        So, can you guess which percentage of people prefer using an smartphone to read these kind of anti smartphone articles? Do you see the issue? The irony?

        This is just trash ragebait dude.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But people clicked it, and it’s the only thing that matters. Of course banning smartphones completely is a stupid idea, but it’s a wild claim that draws attention.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Idk why don’t you go directly to the site?

      https://jacobin.com/

      Looks fine to me but they’re preaching to the choir. You’re certainly right that people have only been posting their shit takes here.

      Like some kind of engagement or rage bait or something