einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agosome days i cant evensh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1515arrow-down115
arrow-up1500arrow-down1imagesome days i cant evensh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square70linkfedilink
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down8·2 days agoPeople who unironically think this should go clean some leaves themselves and see how long they stick with the rake. It’s always so much easier to tell other people how to do their job.
minus-squarehungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day ago‘Cleaning’ leaves is stupid as hell anyway.
minus-squarepixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·24 hours agoBWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SORRY I CAN’T HEAR YOU OVER THE NEIGHBOR BLOWING LEAVES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 days agoBut I hate climate change and like bees
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·edit-22 days agoDepends if you’re going for most or all of the leaves. If you’re just going for most and you’re not incompetent, rake is easy and quick.
minus-squareeinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agois a blower more fun, yes, do i drive a tank instead of a bike because of that? no
People who unironically think this should go clean some leaves themselves and see how long they stick with the rake.
It’s always so much easier to tell other people how to do their job.
‘Cleaning’ leaves is stupid as hell anyway.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SORRY I CAN’T HEAR YOU OVER THE NEIGHBOR BLOWING LEAVES AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
But I hate climate change and like bees
Depends if you’re going for most or all of the leaves. If you’re just going for most and you’re not incompetent, rake is easy and quick.
is a blower more fun, yes, do i drive a tank instead of a bike because of that? no