deleted by creator

the commenters didn’t read it either

oh neat, there’s a new standard that pushes up to 240W

ouch, usb c caps out at 100W afaik

If it’s from the last few years and the barrel input has an adjacent usb-c port it may accept usb power delivery

The port may not even be labeled for it

or copy it to a usb drive; last time i checked external drives will automatically map to the next available drive letter, so you could just plug one in and type D:\bypassnro

that is assuming the script doesnt use relative paths or have any checks against doing this

They removed that option from win 11, you need to run a batch file and disconnect interfaces

all these comments and only one is the correct answer

A lot of users on here have an unhealthy obsession with bringing up awful events everywhere all the time - donating and raising awareness is good but turning every topic around to be about specific conflicts and political happenstance in a forum already saturated with that content isn’t encouraging for other people to engage and probably isn’t conducive to mental wellness either

fair point

calm down

phone enjoyer is ungovernable

Id get that close if I want to give the phone enjoyer behind me plenty of time to stop

tile just had a data breach 👎

I don’t like Joe. I’m still voting for him because he’s not Donald Trump

That is exactly the situation. No part of this post is hateful; it’s adversarial because women expressed a justified fear and men just “disagreed” because they don’t like to think about it. The point is to be controversial yet morally correct as a statement. It would absolutely not work just as well if it was inclusive, people would just agree with it and no one would care.

Do you disagree with the statement? It doesn’t sound like you do. What’s the issue? Who is harmed by this post?

Most bears don’t seek out and attack women, but many men do. One of those happens far more often than the other, and you’re either uninformed or willfully ignorant about that fact.

Then the post wouldn’t have meaning because that’s a universally agreed upon moral sentiment on its face. The post is targeting people who would rather take offense to recent discourse rather than slowing down and considering how this moral sentiment applies to the situation. Without specifying ‘women’ and ‘men’ the post would not have contextual meaning.

You’re free to make your own ‘inclusive’ meme that states the obvious, but the people this meme is targeted toward would see it as obvious and not consider how it pertains to their behavior.

You agree with the post, why change it?

elaborate?