There is a hydrogen fusion reaction that releases beta particles, i.e., electrons. This could be used to produce electricity directly without boiling water, but I think the heat output would be such that you could also boil water for more electricity.
- 0 Posts
- 419 Comments
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Technology@lemmy.world•Dead mosquito proboscis used for high-resolution 3D printing nozzleEnglish
2·1 month agoI don’t hate them because they’re women, I hate them for what they eat! Which they do because they’re female. 🤔
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Technology@lemmy.world•Dead mosquito proboscis used for high-resolution 3D printing nozzleEnglish
14·1 month agoI’d say harming mosquitoes (females only, that feed on blood) is better than vegan!
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Of all modern Sci-Fi Dystopia depicted in movies, which do you think our world will most resemble or already does resemble?
8·1 month agoWell, this isn’t a unique concept. The fact it goes horrible pretty quickly and people keep falling for it is the truly impressive part.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Of all modern Sci-Fi Dystopia depicted in movies, which do you think our world will most resemble or already does resemble?
4·1 month agoI wish we had Gattaca instead of what we have. At least the shitty people would be genetically superior, for whatever that’s worth, instead of just richer.
The Deep? That you?
Maybe it would be less happy without the pain!
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
news@lemmings.world•Read Marjorie Taylor Greene’s full four-page statement resigning from Congress: ‘I refuse to be a battered wife’English
3·1 month agoI like the performative glass-wearing. I’ve never seen her wear glasses before, but glasses make you look smarter, and she needs to look smarter right now, not angrier. So she has glasses on, but they’re pushed down her nose so she can still see over them. You might argue that she needs them for reading, but she could just get progressives and wear them normally.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
1·1 month agoAbsolutely, but then you should have picked a better group to compare them to.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Not to get all religous but was not Jesus pissed for people making money in churches? Didn't he flip tables and everything? Then how do churches nowadays explain the collection plate?
7·1 month agoIf people were doing this, how would you know? And if other people aren’t, what do you expect the people who are to do about it? Are you hoping for a Streets of New York scene where the non-intrusive Christians duke it out with the loudmouthed Christians until only one group is left?
I’m not saying what you’re saying is wrong, it just doesnt address the question of the guy who responded to you.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
1·1 month agoSure, but that’s a very low bar.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
15·1 month agoBut we are. It’s about our behavior, not the subject we’re acting on.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
10·1 month agoYour perception of what a psychopath is colored by media portrayals and what notable psychopaths have done. Not all physicists are like Richard Feynman, and they’re all at least reasonably smart.
What you’re describing is a psychopath who is stupid. They do stupid things because they are stupid, and they do psychopath things because they’re a psychopath. They aren’t going to lead the police on a chase across the country after a string of murders. If they kill someone, they’ll probably be caught the very first time. The reason they will kill will be somewhat less nuanced than an intelligent psychopath’s reasons, but that’s the smart vs. stupid difference - they’re both psychopaths. Neither will feel remorse, neither will feel any compelling need to achieve their goals by not harming someone else, and both would do it again if they felt the circumstances warranted it. One will just do it in a way where he might not get caught and the other won’t think that far ahead or will do such a poor job of it that thinking ahead won’t help.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
1·1 month agoIntelligence and good behavior aren’t inherently linked. Also, there’s good evidence that some part of the Neanderthal population was bred into modern humans.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
11·1 month agoI had a mouse problem once upon a time, and the new “humane” traps didn’t actually kill them. I got tired of bludgeoning them with a shovel and drowned one, thinking it would be easier. That was brutal and horrific, and I went back to using the shovel.
There is nothing humane about drowning an animal.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Have you ever met a truly evil person? What happened?
8·1 month agoI wouldn’t say killing animals is categorically psychopathic, but killing them inhumanely certainly is.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Whats a band/artist who's music all sounds the same?
2·1 month agoHee Hee!
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Whats a band/artist who's music all sounds the same?
4·1 month agoI’d say Thunder sounds somewhat different from their other music, and I don’t enjoy it at all.
GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.cato
Technology@lemmy.world•Unremovable Spyware on Samsung Devices Comes Pre-installed on Galaxy Series DevicesEnglish
1·1 month agoThat’s pretty funny. It’s been legally mandated that bootloaders be unlockable in my country, which I’ve done before.

Time for a joke.
And economist and an accountant were taking a walk when they noticed a frog. The accountant says to the economist, “I’ll give you $100 if you eat that frog.” The economist thinks for a moment, then agrees. A little later they come across another frog, and the economist says, “I’ll give you $100 to eat that frog.” The accountant thinks about it for a second and also agrees. As they continue walking, the accountant says, “So I got to see you eat a frog for $100, and by eating a frog myself, I got my money back, so I understand why I did it. But you had already eaten a frog and had $100, so why did you do it?” The economist replies, “Ah, but this way it’s twice as good for the economy!”