You should probably take a look into puppy Linux, if low specs. Otherwise anything with xfce should run better on it.

Well if you’re watching it that close, sounds like what you want is total immersion. Have you considered an Apple headset? Or something similar

Bad Apple

Only if they specifically seem fascist, because that’s the one political group that likes to know everything you do and censor any dissenting opinion.

I like a big screen for gaming too, but just wanted to mention it also means you’ll do worse at games. You can look it up, but a smaller screen gives you better performance, because your brain can properly see everything that’s happening on screen at once.

Unless your screen is significantly far away that is.

Yeah but do you also watch tv from about 1.8 meters away? Look at that chart again.

Rock and Stone!

DnD and Discord/Revolt video game groups.

I’m an introvert though so I’m okay just being on my own.

They had surgery was my guess at least

So Gorons are Dwarves confirmed.

If you live here in the Nordics, Snellman and sometimes HK has bacon with no phosphates.

Well, it adds taste, depending on the person.

And specifically if you’re a pregnant woman, it’s a very rich source of folic acid.

The point of the meme, is to show nature sucks. The point in this case is the crazy morphological changes animals in general (which includes humans) can go through via an extreme example of the caterpillar, not to equate a person to a caterpillar. It was poking a little fun at the fascination you and assumably many other men (and even some women) have at the changes women go through for pregnancy despite knowing about the extreme changes a caterpillar goes through usually during elementary school. Knowing that, it shouldn’t be surprising that anything could go through drastic changes for the sake of reproduction. Just because it’s an insect does not mean it’s not complex. It’s probably a good time to mention a tomato has more genes than a human.

But now you’re starting to turn it into not only a suffering contest, but a human superiority contest: Hyenas have cognition too and they basically give birth through a penis, along with basically having second puberty for the females. Elephants are extremely cognizant and have to go through extremely long pregnancies, on top of humans also nearly making them go extinct because of something stupid like ivory.

And since you want to make it a suffering competition, the animals win because humanity has screwed them over so badly many are going extinct on a mass scale, including the cognizant ones going through pregnancy themselves.

Instead of just making pointless suffering games on what is meme post where you can expect jokes based off the memes to occur, you can instead at least link to organizations that help women (and in my case, animals as well).

Wait till you hear about caterpillars.

Evolution is one hell of a drug

Or that they’re very wealthy

Frida Kahlo survived her injuries. So did Phineas Gage.

I mean, if money is no issue…

But they also have cheaper options, including a wearable player if you want absolute minimalism.

Based on their comment history, I don’t trust the this will be left wing sources as much as tankie ones.

It also might be funded by Qatar

It could also be that the owner is named Crompton Veggie, and these are his Veggie burgers

So I looked further into it, and saw that the information you have on your claim is technically true, but very outdated.

An ICL has an estimated averaged 10.5% chance of causing cataracts - if it’s the old types of lens.

The newer ones, that come with small macroholes in them, drops that chance to an average of 1.2% chance.

And the newest type still, made with micropores as well as the macroholes, is currently at 0.5% chance - although it’s too new for exact long term data, and the percentage is so low it’s within margin of error.

The reason cataracts had a chance of forming in the old type of lenses was

•because the lenses were much bigger •the lack of holes messed with fluid circulation •bigger lenses increased the odds of the surgeon messing up the placement

In all cases however, ICL leaves no permanent damage to the eye, unlike LASIK, and has fewer side effects in general. It’s also, importantly, reversible, so even in the case of cataracts, or anything else like worsened vision, you can have the lens removed and replaced. With LASIK, the damage means the change is permanent, and improving eyesight afterwards is much more limited.

This information I found from research papers I had to use sci-hub to read, which I can’t link, but I can go through my search history to give you the DOIs if you want.

Btw, all this was a bit moot because I also found out that LASIK can also increase the odds of cataracts as well.