

It’s published by Brietbart. With that track record, they could have said Bilbo Baggins owned the plant watering service, and it’d be just as believable.
It’s published by Brietbart. With that track record, they could have said Bilbo Baggins owned the plant watering service, and it’d be just as believable.
I mean, that’s the best side effect of their colonization. They brought Escoffier’s technique to other regional cuisine.
Can you even imagine Vietnamese food without the heavy French influence?
The part you wrote. The first post definitely, and then also this last post. It’s the words you used, and then the order you placed those words in.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I bet that felt good 👍. And your very small group of an echo chamber agreed with you.
The problem is you want to feel better. Not change something. Some people just like feeling better than others, others like making other things better.
This type of argument may make you feel better, but it doesn’t really help anything but make you think better of yourself. Listen to what others say in discourse, or they won’t listen to you.
Far too many make enemies out of allies and hurt their own cause in the process.
Nah I matched the tone of who I was responding to.
Intresting paper. It is not the conclusive evidence that you think it is. It’s ok, reading science is hard.
Paper concluded that the vegan diet did not seem to have adverse effects, but they had a very small sample size and the expiriment went on for a very short duration.
And then they site scientific papers that disagree with their findings. So there definitely is science out there that disagrees with the vegan diet being ok.
I mean, you’re kinda being a dick… it’s a better than my parents generations response to being autistic. Jesus lol, trust me.