

I wish I were there to see for myself, since that is how I am able to verify evidence
I wish I were there to see for myself, since that is how I am able to verify evidence
Thank you for explaining. you have saved me time, money, and heartbreak.
Ends the justify means thinking. “why improve the process or experience, when my way already works far better than simply stomping on them to get them to open up?”
“because the taste of shoe doesn’t pair well with many flavors”
“My way has 85% less shoe licking”
“Ok, I can think of at least 3 ways you could remove the shoe entirely and it would almost certainly still work (unless of course people intentionally misuse the tools required for the solution)”
“You just want to go back to stomping on them, don’t you!”
If you lack scientific understanding of the material world, or you are wanting to use cynicism and disregard as proof, just say so.
All those people who were “relieved from extreme poverty” in such settler nations chose to do so on the backs of indentured servants who are not counted in your statistics, as white men tended to often exclude in consideration when formulating convincing metrics to justify their behavior.
Actions have always “spoken” louder than the thought we have, especially the thoughts which some people may choose to put into words in various contexts. few creatures in existence are brave enough for actual honest self reflection beyond some personal threshold of comfort which they have established for themselves, and wish to venture no further beyond. I think people who don’t recognize any of what I am talking about above, or who may be narcissistically excluding themselves from consideration while agreeing with the sentiment, are some of the people who end up screeching as you have described, over topics that they have yet to delve deeply into, as they fear being perceived as amateur or even novice, while never even fully recognizing that the Dunning-Kruger effect simply must apply to themselves as well, to some degree, in any area of study that they are actively pursuing with passion.
not trying to intrude or provide any valid critique or communicable perspective necessarily, but I was wondering what the concept of “Political” means, in terms you could best use to describe the feeling/notion to someone? I can think of a couple criteria in mind that I would associate as making a topic that was not otherwise related directly to activities of some level of some government somewhere, suddenly seem “Political” from my perspective. I am curious mostly just what criteria you might use to filter topics or general ideas?
if I sound like a bot it’s because spectrum disorder not autofill so read carefully for L’s sake
Was the costco size a cheese pizza, or pepperoni?
I’d think you would want super-mirrors more than a pistol to fight the sun, but maybe the real joke was the astronaut got brain damage from the return trip
Thanks for pointing out the knobvious
oh it’s shitty for sure. I was just genuinely wondering if anyone would help me decipher what they (author/poster) had digested before dropping this gem
best I can think of for the punchline to make sense is that the author is calling Trump a shrimp for not trying to go all out and name the gulf after himself, but I think I feel like I am scratching my head until my scalp bleeds to come up with anything humorous about the statue of liberty or the mexican outside. I don’t get why Kelly there would want to egg on the war pigeons, having the background of an air of nationalism as the whole joke of the comic. something I am missing or maybe he is simply ascendant in the layering and I couldn’t hope to peel through without learning more about his profile as a cartoonist.
Edit: I seriously shit my pants
Kelly there had a lot of onion juice that morning then. If one understands more than half of the symbolism of this comic, then maybe someone with more familiarity with the layers to this onion would care to explain the punchline of “gulf shrimp” to me. It looks like a mess from the outside in
I propose dividing it up into sectioned off plots of an inwardly spiraling interior/exterior border line, having radially orthagonal borders with neighboring countries in the spiral. The middle country can be a few dozen square km circular blob. give the middle one nukes and offer them to join nato
I like autonomous drone strikes more than tank’s nowadays anyways.