Fr. I was expecting scrumptious woke mindvirus infection content, not this

But why?

Both are serving as a pipeline for group-based enmity/bigotry for a specific target group. Tate pulls in sexually frustrated and insecure men and turns them into mysogynists. JKR pulls in middle aged insecure liberal-feminists and introduces them to transphobia.

Look, as much as I dislike Tate’s misogyny bullshit I haven’t heard of trans rights being rolled back due to his involvement in lobbying and funding hate-groups.

Let’s just say both of them are horrible human beings.

This is giving me hope that I might actually be fine and succeed in interviews lol. On the other hand maaan I really don’t wanna maintain code written by AI-andys…

Edit: Lemmy somehow converts all my ^ symbols to <sup> and </sup> for whatever reason. My apologies

In simple terms, an elliptic curve is just the set of points satisfying an elliptic curve equation of form y^2 = x^3 + a*x + b. We say a point is “on the curve” if it satisfies the given equation. The parameters a and b are some “numbers” (often over a finite field—if that doesn’t ring a bell, just ignore it. It’s not important for now) and constant for any specific elliptic curve.

So let’s say we have the following equation

y^2 = x^3 + x + 6

The point (2, 4) would be on the curve, since we can plug in 2 for x and 4 for y and verify that the equality does in fact hold, since we get 4^2 = 16 on the lefthand side and 2^3 + 2 + 6 = 8 + 2 + 6 = 16 on the righthand side.

Through some mathematical trickery we can also perform operations on the curve, i.e. “add” two points. This is not as straight forward as let’s say standard arithmetic, where you just add numbers as per usual, but we can in fact define an operation that combines two points on the curve to yield another point on the curve cleanly. The process is very ugly when you look at the formula but there is some nice visual intuition for it:

We have a curve (red) and two points: P and Q. Focus only on the left image for now. We draw a line through both P and Q and see where that line has its third intersection point with the curve. On the left most picture that would be the point R. We take R and mirror it down (imagine putting a mirror along the x-axis, the x-coordinate of R stays the same but the y-coordinate gets flipped). I very expertly drew in that new point in green. And that’s it! That’s our result of adding P and Q.

The pictures 2, 3 and 4 are a bit weird. In those, we don’t get a third intersection point with the curve. In these special cases we say the result is O—sort of a point at infinity. Don’t think too hard about what that means, it’s just a mathematical trick to deal with the edge-cases. We do this by saying that the result of addition is O if we don’t get a third intersection point with the curve. Adding any point P to O gets you P back. So O is basically our zero for addition.

This type of “addition” then allows us to perform “calculations” by using the operation defined by the curve. Doing so we can formulate more complicated problems—where finding a solution is very difficult but verifying a solution is easy. This is the basis for their usefulness in cryptography, since we want to be able to encrypt easily but make decrypting without a given key very very difficult.

Hope that helps!

Marx: May I introduce myself?

advertisement spam

Could you elaborate on those reasons, please? I’m not sure what you mean.

Freedom for the rich and powerful to fuck over society and everyone else!

The time has come to GNU-slash the enemies of freedom!

That’s because it’s running low on uranium!

I’m so sick of these AI slop-hype-angst articles.

Things are moving much faster than anyone would have thought possible and violence, real physical violence is an unavoidable property of any fascist regime.

I would kindly ask you to speak for yourself. Leftists and historians have warned about the fascist tendencies of Trump and the Republican Party for years. We know from history how fast things move once fascists start seizing actual power (as opposed to just cultural power/media hegemony). It’s okay to be surprised, it’s okay to admit you did not expect this, as corporate media and the center-right Democrat establishment has largely been downplaying the seriousness of your situation. But please don’t erase all the voices that have been warning you about this, as they are also the ones you should listen to more if you want to resist fascism.

• Remember jan 6th? That was your wakeup call. Democrats largely treated it as a cosmetic issue (defeat the Republicans by playing respectability politics and painting themselves as the “adults in the room”). You should have buried the insurrectionists and Trump with criminal charges. And those charges should have been treated with the utmost seriousness and urgency.
• https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Z55AEOPYlYc
• https://forward.com/culture/546615/book-bans-nazis-berlin-florida/
• https://www.newsweek.com/ron-desantis-nazi-symbol-campaign-sonnenrad-1814801
• https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Tyranny …

The way I see it, the Democrats have to open up to leftists and progressives and abandon their bipartisan centrism bs. You need another FDR and an associated narrative to stomp out fascism. You need a proper alliance of the center and the left, which requires the Democrats to get their sh** together and actually start resisting. Walz is doing great btw if you want an example of what left-moderate Democrats should be doing rn.

Here’s one of my favorite quotes from Erich Kästner (1899-1974), a german pacifist and staunch opponent of the nazi-regime, whose books were burned by the nazis, outlining his lessons from that horrible time in history:

Die Ereignisse von 1933 bis 1945 hätten spätestens 1928 bekämpft werden müssen. Später war es zu spät. Man darf nicht warten, bis der Freiheitskampf Landesverrat genannt wird. Man darf nicht warten, bis aus dem Schneeball eine Lawine geworden ist. Man muss den rollenden Schneeball zertreten. Die Lawine hält keiner mehr auf. Sie ruht erst, wenn sie alles unter sich begraben hat. Das ist die Lehre, das ist das Fazit dessen, was uns 1933 widerfuhr. Das ist der Schluss, den wir aus unseren Erfahrungen ziehen müssen, und es ist der Schluss meiner Rede. Drohende Diktaturen lassen sich nur bekämpfen, ehe sie die Macht übernommen haben.

My attempt at translation (German to English is kind of weird if you want to keep the sentence structure close to the original text):

We should have put all our efforts into fighting the nazi regime [1933-1945 was the time of the nazi dictatorship] no later than 1928, any time later would have been too late. We can not and must not wait until resistance is treated as sedition. We must not wait until the snowball [of fascism] has become an avalanche. We must stomp on/crush the snowball before it can become an avalanche. Once it has become an avalanche there is no stopping it [fascism]. It [the avalanche] will only come to rest once it has buried us all. This is the lesson we should learn from the events of 1933. This is the crux of what our experiences [what we have lived through] have taught us and I hereby conclude my speech. Imminent dictatorships can only be fought before they have seized power.

As a european I have to say I really do hope he swiftly drives you into the ground as quickly and as hard as possible. That way, you might still have a chance to save whatever is left of your democracy before the surveillance state can be fully weaponized against his opposition. The human suffering a fully formed fascist state would bring upon your people (an the rest of the world mind you) would over time still be much worse than the mother of all economic crashes if he triples down on his stupid tariffs right now.

In Germany “du hs” is considered an insult and I think that’s beautiful.

Oh no, APA style

Sure, let’s forfeit even more power to corporate news which not only covers up western imperialism but also pushes right-wing narratives