I was talking with a Russian expat about"nato threat to Russia", and he just replied laughting “what threat?”

Maybe it’s a bit strong to say they don’t care. Most I know, they do care but it’s low on the priority list, after “the economy” which affects their savings held up in stocks…

That’s the issue I faced. When turning off vpn, it works…

What? If I understand it all, do I get a PhD in salad?

I got pictures of a duck eating chicks as well

I’m a scientist, I can’t confirm. My specialty is signal processing.

According to “explain xkcd”, its “The Evolution of Threat Display in Mammals”

What’s the thesis topic?

The folding of Thorn Displays in Monroe? Doesn’t make sense to me

Relevant username!

In many advanced physics fields, they use an arbitrary unit system in which c=1, making equations easier to write down. E=m

Haha that’s exactly it: perception of reality. It doesn’t change the underlying real world, and so it only affects “truth” if we are forced to redefine it based on what socio-constructivism wants it to be.

It’s just like alt-right debates: just by accepting to play the game, you already lost. It’s a logical paradox, and therefore it can’t be a valid theory.

Definitely not! It just so happened that in my life experience, I was introduced to socio-constructivism just at the same time that alt-right was beginning to be a thing…

When professors were telling us “Einstein proved that Newton was wrong” without understanding that relativity reduces to Newtonian mechanics at low speed… It really failed to get me on board.

That simply means it must melt below 600°C.

A quick wiki check says it melts at 660. I guess if you’re in a really dark room, you could see the glow.

Considérons that our lungs and intestines are porous on a molecular scale… And also our sweat pores… Plus are blood vessels (connected to previously mentioned holes)…

Humans have a changing topology depending on the size scale at which you’re working.

It’s important to make sure our basic definitiins and assumptions are well defined… That being said I’ve always been pissed at epistomogists that opened the door to crackpots and manipulators to “define their own truth” and invite fascism.

I’m not saying epistomology is bad, but creating a debate about a well established fact is exactly what right-wing people will do when trying to impose their anti-scientific ideas.

Wow, there’s still some shelf space left in-between Christmas stuff in your store?

Mass generalization are always wrong!

I encourage you to find other things to listen than radio.

Ice I, ice II, … all the way to Ice XVI!

I think McMaster still has a catalogue…