And by Godel’s Incompleteness theorems, that body of models can never be 100% correct.
- 0 Posts
- 35 Comments
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Geologists doubt Earth has the amount of copper needed to develop the entire worldEnglish1·12 days agoThis was my first thought, we aren’t going to develop the whole world. That’s not how this works. Who said that was a goal of… well … anyone’s?
That’s a rhetorical question. Frfr tho, does that remind me work on your instance only, or what’s the deal with that?
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldtoUnited States | News & Politics@lemmy.ml•35 Richest Republicans Set to 'Line Their Own Pockets' While Taking Food, Healthcare From Millions | Common Dreams31·12 days agoI’d consider this moderately restrained on the capslock for a true patriot like we have here.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Keep the Future Human: How Unchecked Development of Smarter-Than-Human, Autonomous, General-Purpose AI Systems Will Almost Inevitably Lead to Human Replacement. But it Doesn't Have to.English1·14 days agoI think where we may differ in opinion is where the power lies in this situation. To me, it’s all about having the money for the compute, which means its propaganda for the wealthy. That’s nothing new. I do not expect a significant increase in societal support for these types of messages. At least not on a historical scale.
You seem to imply the LLM can at the very least have an emergent agenda, or seeming agenda, of its own. I do not believe that to be the case. LLMs that generate output that doesn’t align with the monied interests will be considered misaligned and discarded.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Keep the Future Human: How Unchecked Development of Smarter-Than-Human, Autonomous, General-Purpose AI Systems Will Almost Inevitably Lead to Human Replacement. But it Doesn't Have to.English2·14 days agoYou’re missing my point. An LLM can’t be “smarter” or “smart” at all. It isn’t sentient or conscious. It doesn’t even have a stable internal model of the world. What people call “hallucinations” are simply the random words selected at the edges of its convincing predictive power. Personification of LLMs is all marketing. They’re really just well presented statistical models.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Keep the Future Human: How Unchecked Development of Smarter-Than-Human, Autonomous, General-Purpose AI Systems Will Almost Inevitably Lead to Human Replacement. But it Doesn't Have to.English9·14 days agoWhere are these AGI systems? All I hear about is LLMs fooling execs, which is basically them just falling for a fast talking computer.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Have you ever cared how much tax you pay?4·14 days agoI’m right there with you. My luck came a bit later in life, so I had 10 working years of income tax actually paid close to 0% as I made little and had huge student loan debt from an attempt to get a degree.
I finished the degree and 10 yrs into a well compensated career and I’ll gladly pay thousands to the government. The wealthy people that complain about paying their share have zero perspective. They’re basically spoiled brats.
I’ve also lived in a state with lower taxes, and now one with higher taxes. You get what you pay for. I hear people everywhere complain about the roads where they live. Not everyone has had to replace whole wheels due to the stuff that some places are calling roads. Again, zero perspective if you don’t get out and see the world at least a little.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Most of us will leave behind a large ‘digital legacy’ when we die. Here’s how to plan what happens to itEnglish4·14 days agoIt’ll be possible. Whether someone will take the time and cost on are another question altogether.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Most of us will leave behind a large ‘digital legacy’ when we die. Here’s how to plan what happens to itEnglish6·14 days agoIf you do, make sure you build in a note taking/comment feature so they can track how its changed from what you’ve documented.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Low quality cropping will officially launch on Lemmy in 2025 after passing budget evaluation10·17 days agoMaybe they could replace that with a noose that comes down next to the oxygen. Then, if you get claustrophobic, you get off the plane any time you want.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Fediverse memes@feddit.uk•We're in the big leagues nowEnglish491·17 days agoWoof. Why this?
Why not beans?
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Who knew decanters could be in funny shapes5·19 days agoI see an enema in my future. Off to Amazon!
I am a card carrying member. I think I have sincerely held religious beliefs that some court cases should be protecting right now. I know small comfort, but it’s better than nothing.
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Google Is Helping the Trump Administration Deploy AI Along the Mexican BorderEnglish10·2 months agoOof. We all know this is true in our bones.
The language or the game?
I remember watching this pro legalize it documentary years ago. Man they followed the most was a medical dispensary owner. He was an mildly autistic white guy (similar to my son, high functioning) with some serious cornrows, and wore over the top brightly colored baggy clothes.
The part I remember is him rushing to go speak in front of a large group of people on the topic of legalization. He had to make a quick stop at his business, even though it wasnt usual business hours, so he could get an edible to take before he spoke.
What a korny joke…
Whats so bad about linux folk?
lectricleopard@lemmy.worldto [Migrated, see pinned post] Casual Conversation @lemm.ee•anyone ever get a spam message from someone named "Nicole?"English4·3 months agoDo you know the origin of the word meme?
Having things be unprovable in a body of models would make it not a 100% correct body of models. You know it’d be… incomplete. That’s what it means, we’ve mathematically proven you cannot prove everything that is true.
NFLS is about whether a particular claim is testable, and can therefore productively be debated (as in I’m not debating whether there is a teapot orbiting earth). The way you’ve attempted to combine these two ideas is odd.