Why not bother them?

Browsing without login still gives you an algorithm, but one for the lowest common denominator. I’d suggest using the subscription feed

In us states with no tipped minimum wage (such as Oregon), we still tip 20%

In the US, we weigh ourselves in pounds. But nutritional information about food is in grams.

Imo, the fact that the numerator and denominator units are incompatible isn’t a big deal since the message “eat .08% percent of your body weight in protein each day” is not the intuitive way to think about how much to eat. It’s much easier to use a unit in the numerator that is common measuring nutrition and a unit in the denominator that is common for measuring body weight.

A history of rock music in 500 songs is very good

(Your comment is hidden on the main post weirdly)

I assume you mean you can’t see it on discuss.online

This is because that server defederated from lemmygrad.ml see https://discuss.online/instances for a list of instances that discuss.online blocks. This also means that op cannot read this thread.

An excellent contrapoints video explores this topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPhrTOg1RUk

To be fair, the food butternut squash is doing fine even though it contains the phrase “nut squash”

I prefer Micromamba since it’s faster at solving environments.

George W Bush won the popular vote in 2004

I’m generally against the idea of planting as many trees as possible.

Trees are not very good carbon sinks because they decompose and burn. Also, there are also some ecological communities where adding trees makes the land a worse carbon sink.

Avoiding cutting down forests to build suburbs is something I can certainly get behind though.