That kind of case makes sense, actually.
- 0 Posts
- 6 Comments
Wow, that’s wild. I guess that’s what you get from being such a young/niche project, they haven’t had the time/demand to come up against the problems that all the other distros had to solve years ago.
I DLed Cachy with the torrent. Another thing I wish more distros would offer, haha!
I don’t think I’ve ever encountered a distro that doesn’t offer a torrent download option, since it saves the project expensive hosting costs.
lucas@startrek.websiteto
Linux@lemmy.ml•So, why *should* GNOME support server side decorations?English
416·30 days agodeleted by creator
lucas@startrek.websiteto
Linux@lemmy.ml•df showing a full (99%) ssd, but du only showing a fraction of that? UPDATEDEnglish
1·5 months agoWhere are you running
du -sh *? (I.e. what directory, are you definitely scanning the whole file system?) I’m sure it’s obvious, but can never hurt to check!What does
du -sh /show? (Generally, the*glob pattern in the shell will not match hidden dot-files, so is it possible they are being excluded?)
lucas@startrek.websiteto
Programming@programming.dev•IT-TOOLS - Collection of handy online tools for developers, with great UXEnglish
21·6 months agoOr use both. That’s what I do, they serve suitably different needs for different situations, even if there is an overlap, and it’s not like they’re heavy tools
Precisely. SSD puts the decorations in the hands of your window manager, which allows you to customise what information and controls are available in the title bar (or if you even want to display one at all), so you can use the space much more efficiently. With CSD, you’re down to the whims and opinions of the application, and their space-wasting choices (and whether they even choose to respect your theming).