Average gen Z retirement plan

Modern society teaches you to care about all the irrelevant things, and ignore the major manufactured shifts in your life, that makes you more easily controllable. That’s how they domesticated you into working a 9 to 5, paying taxes, voting for a 2 party system, and ignoring major coverups like JFK’s assassination, the Epstein files, the Diddy trial, wars in the middle east, the fact that nuclear MAD is still literally one systemic failure away, yatta yatta yatta…

You could get a job, work less, and get paid for it…

Arch or EndeavourOS (Arch for babies) should give you the best support for any new hardware.

Because everything everyone thinks everywhere is always about america…

Rule 3: No politics

It should be taught in school, and tested. You shouldn’t be able to graduate without basic emotional intelligence.

So?

That’s why I only use “femoid”

I am genuinely ashamed to be his grandson

I diagnose you with 12yo

Btw, John Romero was the lead designer for Doom, Wolfenstein 3D, and Quake. He’s basically one of the inventors of the FPS genre. Way to go, Microsoft…

You read articles in the shower?

V for Vendetta missed the time frame by maybe a decade or two, not much more than that.

Yeah, fuck that town that elected a dog as the mayor, I guess?

Yes, I understood exactly what you said because, as I said before, it’s not hard to understand, it’s just badly formulated.

Natural science is amoral, a jaguar doesn’t care that a gazelle is pregnant when hunting it, since neither of them know what morality is. Scientific research is not naturally moral or immoral, it’s instance dependant. You wouldn’t call Volta immoral for stacking zinc and copper to make a battery, and you wouldn’t think twice before calling Unit 731 immoral.

You don’t get to make a normative claim, wrap it in a false equivalence between human constructs, like scientific research and morality, and the moral independency of natural science, word it inches away from historical fascist research ideals, and then complain when people fill in the blanks in the most plausible way. If you wanted a real discussion, you could’ve developed, from the start, on what you mean, and worded it better. But you didn’t, you’re just rage baiting.

You could’ve said “science is unethical by nature”, or “science is, by nature, unethical”, with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.

About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you’re fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?

As I said, very questionable.

It’s not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it’s just very questionable.

If you think religion is the only reason to be a good person, you need therapy.

Everyone said that about Wayland a decade ago…

Users move on from Windows because of old hardware compatibility, pick an easy to use distro, like Fedora. Fedora drops old hardware compatibility…

It’s their second attempt in under a month. Red Hat needs to sit the fuck down.