Why are you afraid to answer the question?

Does woman and female mean the same thing?

I’m not trying to make a joke.

I’m genuinely looking for clarification.

Is that a yes or a no?

There’s a lot of overcensorship going on here. You gotta keep in mind the mods here are just average people and that means they’re not going to be above mob rule or hysteria.

I’m sorry you got censored. Hopefully we can make and support more communities that don’t abuse their power.

What…?

Plastic surgery and implants

Are you a female?

It’s for children and manchildren.

The humans in my family who experience menstrual cycles

lol

You must be living in a bubble if you truly believe that.

not forced behavior for end users.

This is what I’m constantly criticizing. It’s fine to have more options, but they should be options and not mandatory.

No, having to scroll past an AI summary for every fucking article is not an ‘option.’ Having the option to hide it forever (or even better, opt-in), now that’s a real option.

I’d really love to see the opt-in/opt-out data for AI. I guarantee businesses aren’t including the option or recording data because they know it will show people don’t want it, and they have to follow the data!

Good. I don’t really care about youtube, but less censorship is always a good thing.

How can you people say you respect science when you support silencing any criticism of it? That’s not science. That’s religion.

That said, this criteria clearly only exists to protect “influencers” who make youtube a proportional amount of money. If you have a channel with very little traffic and you say something controversial, you’d better believe your “freedom of expression value” will not be high enough to outweigh the corporation’s perceived “harm risk.”

What frozen pizza brand do you think doesn’t get soggy in the middle?

Love cucumbers, hate pickles.

Vinegar in general is just disgusting to me.

So you’re saying copyright and patent laws only exist to help rich people?

I guess that would make all of the workers defending them ‘useful idiots’ then.

They got that money because of strong enforcement of copyright protections.

Without copyright laws, everyone could’ve just shared Disney’s shit without fear of repercussion and they would have billions less while we collectively have billions more.

I dunno, we’ve seen corporations come at each other many times before.

Most of you people won’t understand this, but copyright and patent laws aren’t going to be around forever. They don’t help the working class and it’s only a matter of time before new generations rise above our tunnel vision and indoctrination.

I mean, just look at this case a prime example. Who is the one suing? Disney. Who stands to benefit? Disney.

Are the random joe’s suing? No, they can’t afford it. The laws do not exist to protect them. It’s another reason why we never see big corporations challenge copyright and patent laws. They know they make more money with them.

Putting periods in acronyms is some 90s shit.

You only need 1 case, but screen protectors can crack if you can believe that.