• 0 Posts
  • 74 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle



  • that is a very cool idea! but then how to counter the fact that money is needed to produce these things such as art, books etc Like dont we pay artists ? directly?

    while digital property is really debated even believed that copyright for physical goods being copied to digital is no fair

    so i could dig into digital intellectual property i will see what i can find

    Excellent thinking! You can of course directly transition into discussions about things like basic income and the requirements of society to cater to the basic needs of all its members before anything like economic growth can even be allowed, but it might be more useful to ask the following questions:

    1. If we removed all art - all paintings, all books, all music, all movies, all games, all installations, that were not commercially produced or commercially produced at a loss - from existence, wouldn’t that still leave more than could ever be consumed in hundreds of human lifetimes? And if so, why do we even need commercial art?
    2. Or more nuanced: How much commercial art does the world need?

    Because once you answer that question you know roughly how much public funds to allocate to art production. Depending on who you ask the answer might even be zero or close to zero.




  • The decline and fall of the Roman empire was something that took place over the course of centuries, involved events largely out of the control of individuals and affected very large areas and very diverse and different cultures.

    I simply may not know enough about it, but I wouldn’t call it “stupid”. It’s just not a word that I can see applying here. It wasn’t a historical event, more like some kind of plate tectonics process.


  • Like do they actually, reliably effect change in the way the activists intend?
    Have they worked against Israel? Did they work against Apartheid South Africa? Could they work against Trump’s America?
    My hunch is that they don’t, really, but can be a useful promotional tool for other issues. Like don’t buy American is a simple message. >If people will listen to that, they may listen to reasons why, which maybe could build a movement.
    But on the whole I am very sceptical, and would be interested in any reasons for or against boycotts.

    Try to look at it the other way around: Every single one of your actions shapes the world around you and thus is a vote for how you want the world to be. By the very act of visiting a country you declare that country to be worth visiting, by purchasing a product you endorse it, by using a service you support the continued existence of that service and all things connected to it.

    Now why wouldn’t the reverse be true?