Wait for a couple years. He will stop doing it eventually.

In the same vane, the root keys for the playstation 3 being released by some hacker causef a lot of hubub from sony.

Habit and peer pressure. There you go.

If the other person needs it and it doesn’t inconvenience me in the long term, yes. Also depends how much I care for the person in question. I don’t do this to just anyone. They usually know if they were wrong and learn from it. They don’t need me to confront them while they are vulnerable.

Doesn’t mean my feelings can’t be hurt though.

You can work within a legal framework while arguing for changing that framework to no longer benefit yourself.

As long as you are honest; you are good.

If you change platform keys, it looks to me like you can brick your system if hardware component drivers that execute during boot are signed by microsoft keys.

Microsoft will make sure many of their partners sign hardware drivers with their keys, to be windows 11 certified of course. No other reason.

They will encourage manufacturers to only allow secure boot in UEFI. Then at some point they will stop signing UEFI loaders, like shim, that linux distros rely on to boot.

…and Bob’s your uncle.

I’m not an expert. But microsoft controls secure boot signing, right?

Microsoft is also involved in setting standards and influences manufacturers. I feel like the future where secure boot is the only option and were Microsoft holds the keys is likely.

Politicians and decision makers are not gonna save us. They like it when companies say it’s for security and they can slap on “it’s for the children”.

I would say; don’t take other peoples opinion in mind. If you make eachother happy; you are good.

If your question is focusing on the reaction of the average person. I would say the average person walking past you on the street, will not raise their eyebrow unless one of the partners looks underage. Or if the 30 year old looks significantly older than 30.

Replace all your comments with ai output. That will let them train on their own output. Make sure there is no original thought. Make it seem that it is in context and hard to filter out for both human and robot.

This will be anoying for everyone who sees it though.

We play sports for fun. Let whoever organizes the event decide.

With the assumption that we are alright in there, wait until it evaporates naturally. I hope you brought a lot of books, cause depending on its mass, it can take some time.

Strap a lidar emitter to yourself. Those car sensors have been shown to damage cameras.

If you want privacy from cameras, there are those hats with strong ir leds. Not sure how well they work.

Does having the power of Q count? Cause that would be the best.

Comment on stuff I guess. Don’t worry about it. It seems to have already taken off.

Try to keep expectations low and you’ll live longer.

If you can’t pull a cable and are dependant on wi-fi, but still want a cable at the end point, buy a wi-fi bridge. You can see it as a switch that you can connect your stuff to with cables, but the connection between the bridge and the router/access point will be wireless, wi-fi.

Your computers won’t know they are using a wireless connection.

Alternatively, if you have an extra, unused ethernet interface on a computer that is already connected to the internet, you can share internet through that interface, making your computer a bridge.

This can be accomplished with an android phone and a usb ethernet adapter too. Though you might want a usb hub or split cable for charging.

Should also be easy to acomplish on windows. At least it was on windows 7, when I last used it.

Get a Raspberry Pi. Newer models have wi-fi. Then you can host all kind of stuff. As long as it is for your own use, you don’t need that much computing power. As far as software is concerned, the type of physical connection doesn’t matter. Wi-fi stability can be excellent or it can be super frustrating. Depending on your circumstance.

Get one and try it. Learn by doing.

The reader might think that your questions are overlaping, making adressing every question redundant. You might want clarity. The reader thinks you can figure it out based on their one answer. They don’t want to spend the time to confirm that which you already have the tools to get to yourself.

I read something about some resarchers looking at what goes on in the brains of elephants when interracring with humans. They concluded that it was similar to the reaction when humans encounter cute things. Was a really long time since i read that. So take it with many salts.

Buy a microscope and look at some bacteria. They evolve fast, in real time, by the same principles other living organisma do.

Science is the process of observing, puting forth hypothesis based on observation and then doing your best to disprove that. If you find something that contradicts your hypothesis, you can safely discard that idea and start over. It is the best method humankind has figured out for getting to truths about what we see around us. If you want absolute proofs, look no further than maths. In the real world, we do the best we can with science. Religion does not fulfill the same role as science do. Religion is not even close to the same concept as science. Religion is more akin to fictional works, like Tolkiens, lord of the rings. Religion makes claims that can neither be proven, nor disproven; which is completely useless for learning anything.

Science is useful in that it makes prediction that allow us to make all the technology around us. Maybe the most useful thing; it tells us what the fundamental limits to what we can do is.

Religion provides no such utility, other than maybe a social community. But I would argue that a board game club can do the same.

Science dominates our society so much, just becauce of it’s usefullness. There is an evolutionary aspect to science itself, right there. The groups that rejects science falls behind, those that embrace it prosper. The stronger prevails, thus science.

Imagine what tribes are likely to get wiped out; the technologically advanced ones or the regressive ones.