

The late Ella 💖



The late Ella 💖





Late 40s. Left Reddit after it became clear what they had become; joined Lemmy to ask an obscure question about Selenium.
Not only would I be okay with that, I’d hope they then replaced all my avatar images online with that photo.
Or it was retrospective.
“Frank what the fuck have you been doing while I was away visiting my family?”
“Um, er, ah, dodging the draft! Yeah, that’s it. Certainly not a month long bender.”
😜


A subset …


Hey human doms I’m 100% okay with, it’s these things I’m worried about
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/doom/images/2/27/Meet_spider.png/revision/latest


playing dom
I do not think we should train a bioengineered intelligence with guns to do that.


Sorry, I was being snarky. What I meant was that a computer running Android (or iOS) can’t really be counted as a PC, in the sense that Google (or Apple) control what you do with it.


There is no such thing as an Android PC.


So how is it decided who works on what, and when?
The point I’m trying to make is that even if a system like Cybersyn could be made to work at the scale required, we’re still in the position of a dystopian “today it’s your turn to work in the salt mines, comrade” decision being made by a higher power, and imposed by law.


Perhaps I wasn’t clear - the value that money and markets add is in the allocation of labour - not the labour itself, but who works on what, when, and to what extent.


So we get an equal amount of these tokens, right? Regardless of how hard the 2 to 3 months essential work is, and regardless of how unpleasant it is?


Okay, sure - but you still have to have robust manufacturing capabilities that you can, at least, scale up at short notice (c.f. artillery shells).
My point was, really, that I see a lot of people trying to simultaneously hold the opinions that they certainly wouldn’t work for arms companies because the entire industry is evil, but also, we should make sure to arm Ukraine.


But at the point where you’re distributing arbitrary tokens to individuals to have them reveal their preferences in a Cybersyn-like system … you more or less have money and markets again? Unless I’m misunderstanding your suggestion.


You can’t support Ukraine and other victims of military aggression, without having a strong arms industry yourself.


The issue is that the production of those resources requires money.
Not just as a means of exchange - the world is far too large and complex to run on barter - but also, through the mechanism of markets, as a means of resource allocation.
Say you could go and grow 1kg of potatoes, or mine 1kg of copper ore? How do you know which to do?
In a society with money and markets, you look at the prices!
Say you have your 1kg of copper ore. Do you sell it now, or wait?
In a society with money and markets, you guess[1] what the prices will be in the future.
Without money, and markets, large industrial societies fail. That’s not to say that markets are a perfect signaling mechanism - malinvestment is a thing, and can certainly be exacerbated. But the known alternatives (and we’ve tried them) have led to poverty and misery.
[1] I know, I know, …


I think the Vatican is sad that LLMs are encroaching on their turf of “very expensively harming people and especially minors while hallucinating about things that don’t exist”.
USAID wasn’t charity though was it? I believe it was taxpayer funded.